🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial move to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, child protection groups, and guardians are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing group of states are moving toward similar bans.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister declaring that phones and apps are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". A law could be formalized next year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, citing the need to protect young people from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an similar ban is "an measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked lawmakers to approve a proposal lifting the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged families to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has adopted a advisory motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 except if parental consent is granted. Although it warns of the "compulsive" design of these apps, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a solid starting point," stated a leading parliamentarian driving the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "supported by strong research".

Previously, momentum built behind a legislative effort to introduce restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately watered down. However, the government vowed to further research the issue.

Advocacy groups have voiced warnings. One foundation set up by the relatives of a young person who was lost after viewing harmful platform posts argues that a blanket age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for young users," said a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, action is primarily occurring at the state government level amid national stalemate.

• The state of Utah mandates adult approval for minors to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a measure barring under-14s from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a law capping under-16s to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with any further time requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed laws demanding guardian approval for minors to set up social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from various politicians to copy this lead, a US-wide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Outside of these regions, other countries are also taking action.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, world bodies take a more measured tone. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for marginalized children and that government action should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

As this worldwide conversation continues, the actions of this nation and several other countries indicate that states internationally are increasingly content to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.